Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Azorius Flash | levunga21 | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Bounce | rastaf | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Tempo , Cats Aggro , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Demons
Meta Performance Analysis
Floodpits Drowner ranks #187 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 46%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.0%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Floodpits Drowner is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 17.57 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Floodpits Drowner has a win rate of 72.6%, making it 2.8% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 9 | 88.6% | 7 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 88.6% | 3 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 6 | 84.5% | 4 |
| Final Vengeance | Sorcery | 10 | 75.2% | 4 |
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 30 | 75.0% | 10 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 24 | 74.6% | 10 |
| Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 5 | 73.6% | 2 |
| Leyline Axe | Artifact — Equipment | 20 | 72.9% | 9 |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 8 | 71.6% | 2 |
| Loot, the Pathfinder | Legendary Creature — Beast Noble | 7 | 69.7% | 4 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Floodpits Drowner than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 2 | 5 | 86.2% | 75.3% | +10.9% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 6 | 81.8% | 71.8% | +10.0% |
| No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 8 | 78.2% | 71.9% | +6.3% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 10 | 79.4% | 73.1% | +6.2% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 10 | 77.6% | 71.7% | +5.9% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 7 | 76.2% | 72.3% | +3.9% |
| Grim Bauble | Artifact | 1 | 26 | 75.6% | 72.8% | +2.8% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 28 | 75.3% | 72.7% | +2.6% |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 27 | 75.5% | 72.9% | +2.6% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 9 | 77.6% | 75.1% | +2.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1890 | 91.3% | 51.2% |
| Dimir Bounce | 433 | 87.7% | 49.7% |
| Azorius Flash | 207 | 91.6% | 60.3% |
| Temur Otters | 130 | 38.7% | 48.9% |
| Esper Pixie | 69 | 4.4% | 49.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.